Vic and all, some rough calcs at 100 mHz shows close agreement with your
results. Assuming the 12 uH number is a parallel equivalent, converting that
to a series form results in 100 +j1.33 or 2.1 nH.
That is in the ballpark for numbers quoted by several others for MOX type
resistors in recent days.
The parallel inductive reactance of the resistor is so high compared to the
small inductance reactance of a typical suppressor that it can be ignored.
How can that type resistor not work just fine?
73,
Gerald K5GW
In a message dated 7/29/2010 10:29:26 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
vic@rakefet.com writes:
Concerning the metal film resistors, I just tried to measure the
inductance of several
different types of 3 watt 100 ohm resistors that I had, including some
that I had
successfully used in parasitic suppressors. I succeeded in proving that
this isn't easy!
An AADE inductance/capacitance meter shows 12 uhy, which is clearly
impossible unless
these are wirewound (with lots of fine wire)!
Connecting them to an MFJ analyzer showed r close to 100 ohms and x = 0 up
to 77 or 80
MHz.for two types. An old one-watt carbon resistor started showing
reactance at about 66
MHz. So I'm guessing that this is mostly due to the lead length,
capacitance, etc. and
that the metal film resistors are no worse than the carbon ones.
On 7/29/2010 5:27 AM, Carl wrote:
> 100pf 500V silver micas are about as common as illegal immigrants in the
US.
> All the major catalog outfits stock them.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Sole"<hs0zed@csloxinfo.com>
> To:<amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
>
>
>> Interesting about how they do the series capacitor arrangement though I
>> still wonder if it is making it overly complicated. Silver Mica
capacitors
>> are about as common as Globar resistors here though so alternatives
would
>> be
>> useful too.
>>
>> As to the power involved I got to digging around and unearthed an
article
>> Rich Measures had published in QST of 1989, it's on his website. Is the
>> theory/math in that article messed up? It certainly suggests there might
>> be
>> more than a couple of watts in the R on 10m.
>>
>> Martin, HS0ZED
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]
On
>> Behalf Of Carl
>> Sent: 29 July 2010 01:33
>> To: Jim Thomson; amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jim Thomson"<jim.thom@telus.net>
>> To:<amps@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:33 AM
>> Subject: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
>>
>>
>>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:11:22 +0200
>>> From: "DF3KV"<df3kv@t-online.de>
>>> Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
>>>
>>> Why is that impossible?
>>> On HF the resistor is almost shorted out by the inductor.
>>> The power absorbed will be less then 0.5% of the desired HF with a
>>> typical
>>> amp.
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> ### .5% of 1500w = 7.5 watts CCS..which is a bunch. Forget
the
>>> HF
>>
>>> power absorbed
>>> by the resistor. The poor resistor is already being cooked by the
>>> thermal
>>
>>> heat from
>>> the hot anode anyway !
>>
>>
>> ** A single 3-500 is putting out 600-800W so your rating is cut in half.
>> In
>> addition I disagree with the .5% as its more like .1 to .2% with the
>> typical
>>
>> SB-220 type suppressor otherwise they would have lasted up to 40 or so
>> years.
>>
>>
>> I noticed the 10 x 1 meg 2 watt CARBON HV multiplier
>>> resistor's on one of my old B+ supplies from the 70's had all risen
in
>>> value by
>>> 34% ! And that 34% rise was only after 3 yrs. I recently
checked
>>> carbons that
>>> I bought new, back in the 70's..still in their wrapper.. and most of em
>>> are way on the
>>> high side..and were never used.
>>
>>
>> ** I recently got an old Command HF-2500 in for service. Not only were
the
>> filter caps garbage Nichicons withoutout even a temp rating but the
>> metering
>>
>> resistors for ~ 2700V were three 2W carbons! This is as built.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ## Ok... how does one install the cap that's used to negate the XL
of
>>> the MOX
>>> resistor ? Do u wire the cap in series with the resistor.. then
>>> parallel the entire
>>> mess with the coil ? . The Drake L4B uses wide cu strap.... no 12
ga
>>> wire used.
>>
>> Lay the coil and resistor side by each (for you Canadians) without
>> connecting. Now at both ends install a 100pf 500V silver mica between
>> them.
>> This works fine with 1-2 (50-75 Ohms for one, double for a pair) of the
>> Mouser Xicon 5W MOX. It does absolute wonders for a Clipperton L using
one
>> resistor. 1200W key down on 10M for 30-40 seconds with no smoke or
Chinese
>> tube anode color. I use the 5W for everything as some stuff I work on
the
>> parasitic does get close to the operating frequency (old glass bottles)
>> but
>> Ive never even discolored them. Ive tried 91 and 120pf with no apparent
>> change so its rather non critical.
>>
>>>
>>> ## I used one, real small globar in my hb 3-500z amps from the
70's.
>>> The GS35-B
>>> doesn't require a suppressor on 6m. The YC-156 doesn't require a
>>> suppressor an any band,
>>> and neither does the 3CX-3000A7 or 3CX-6000A7.
>>
>> ** I bet some could get them to take off looking at construction
practices
>> used.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ## to reduce the plate load Z on the upper bands of a HF amp.. I typ
>>> install a
>>> .6 uh coil [ 1/4" -3/8" tubing] between plate block caps and input
to
>>> tune cap. This
>>> does not appear to promote instability.
>>
>>
>> ** Not that Ive found even with 2X 4-1000A's at 6KV.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Jim VE7RF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]
On
>>> Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT
>>>
>>>> Of course the main L should be very low
>>>> loss and the complete suppressor should not absorb any of the desired
HF
>>>> power.
>>>
>>> REPLY:
>>>
>>> Not absorb "any" of the desired HF power?
>>>
>>> That is impossible and Carl should know better than to make such a
>>> statement
>>> Bill, W6WRT
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
--
Vic
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|