Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Not free QWERTY

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Not free QWERTY
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:33:20 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

On 8/18/2010 11:51 AM, Bill, W6WRT wrote:
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:37:04 -0700, "Jim Thomson"<jim.thom@telus.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell why the QWERTY plan is in use?
> REPLY:
>
> Legend has it that QWERTY was designed to slow down typists in the
> early days of typewriters. The old typewriters were prone to jam if
> the typist went too fast and QWERTY required more finger movement than
> other layouts, thus slowing them down.
>
> That may or may not be true, but I have heard it all my life.
>
All I can find, and even what we were taught in college (wayyyy back 
when...) confirms it, but that doesn't necessarily make it true. <:-))
OTOH at 70 WPM it was quite easy to jam up a mechanical typewriter, 
often even at 60.  A good typist (keyboarder now days) had to pace 
themselves or they were forever having to reach up and release the levers.

I think I'm letting my age show in knowing this.

73

Roger (K8RI)

> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>