Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 6146 via 572b's

To: "Gary Patterson" <gpatterson53@hotmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 6146 via 572b's
From: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Reply-to: k7fm <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:44:08 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
"how did this thread get it's title??   "6146 via 572b's"  what does it have 
to do with the discussion?

Actually, the digression was normal and almost logical.  The original 
question was regarding using a 10 watt 817 transceiver to drive an 
amplifier.  Then, there was a discussion of different types of amplifiers 
that could be driven with 10 watts.  This, of course, led to minor 
digressions such as super-cathode amplifiers.  All normal for a diverse 
group of radio nuts.

Further logical and normal digression led to a question of the 817 itself 
and how it caused fatigue to the listener.

So, if you think this is a digression, remember, it could have digressed 
into whether using orange gum drop capacitors was fitting to replace a black 
beauty in that found 813 amplifier audio section, or one annual digression 
is whether the amplifier power supply for the 817 should use a neutral and 
dedicated common wiring in the old farmhouse.

We should be thankful the thread did not digress into women's hats.

73,  Colin  K7FM

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>