Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit

To: Jim Tonne <Tonne@Comcast.Net>, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>, "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:10:59 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
All stainless steels are ferrous and I would think that they'd thus all be 
subject to RF heating.

The 300 series alloys have, in general, a higher percentage of chromium and 
nickel and are not magnetic. Some of the 400 series alloys have nearly as much 
but are magnetic.  In either case, the Fe content is still around 70% or more.

Al
AB2ZY

________________________________________
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
Jim Tonne [Tonne@Comcast.Net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:54 PM
To: Rob Atkinson; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank  circuit

I just checked with one of the fellows who has designed his
share of high-power HF rigs and he says brass is the way
to go.   It is usually cadmium-plated to "keep it shiny looking."

Apparently there are varying grades of "stainless" steel and
some of them are truly bad in RF.   High grade SS is OK but
since you can' tell easily the rule was to simply avoid it.

This note concerns the nuts and bolts used to hold the
assembly together.

- Jim W4ENE






_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>