Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Which hearhkit amp would you choose?

To: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>, <Gudguyham@aol.com>, <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Which hearhkit amp would you choose?
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:25:23 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Negative is wrong Jim.

Its called a step start and serves the function it was designed for. There 
is no other reason to use a step start in a SB-220 as the transformers are 
current limited, the switch is the weak link and pretty unobtanium. When 
switching to more C in the PS then it will also help there.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; <Gudguyham@aol.com>; <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Which hearhkit amp would you choose?


> Negative Carl.
>
> The upgrade was to simply save the power switch. It installed a relay to 
> switch the high current AC carried by the front panel switch.
>
> 73
> Jim W7RY
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: <Gudguyham@aol.com>; <Amps@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Which hearhkit amp would you choose?
>
>> Step Start; early production offered an upgrade kit
>>
>> Metering component changes
>>
>> Relative power pot was a failure point, not needed
>>
>> Improved grid cap values...carried over from SB-221
>>
>> Extra safety margin in HV bypass after RFC-2
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <Gudguyham@aol.com>
>> To: <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; <mike.lyon@gmail.com>; <Amps@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Which hearhkit amp would you choose?
>>
>>
>>> What improvements over an SB-221?  Did away with the sensitivity 
>>> control
>>> (cheaper).  No lighted meters (cheaper) . Circuit improvements over  an
>>> SB-221?  What.  if you don't like green, I guess it is MUCH more
>>> attractive.
>>>
>>>
>>> In a message dated 4/13/2011 8:42:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>> km1h@jeremy.mv.com writes:
>>>
>>> HL-2200  if you can find one. It is a reboxed SB-221 for the most part 
>>> but
>>> includes  enough circuit improvements to make it  attractive.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1321 / Virus Database: 1500/3569 - Release Date: 04/12/11
>> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>