Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] RF on audio using 374A

To: <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] RF on audio using 374A
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:40:44 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] RF on audio using 374A


> On 9/14/2011 11:00 AM, Carl wrote:
>> IMO Pin 1 is overblown (as are parasitics by another individual) and I
>> would expect any of the radio manufacturers to already be aware of it.
>
> You would likely change your mind (assuming it is still open for change)
> if you took the time to read the extensive documentation of it, some of
> which is on my website. It is a very clear concept, easily grasped by
> those with even the most minimal engineering education. EMC authority
> Henry Ott has included a discussion of it in the latest edition of his
> classic text on EMC.
>
> > 73, Jim K9YC

 Ive read enough to be almost permanently bored regarding your rather 
constant promomotion of that web site.
However I always keep an open mind, something I learned decades ago when 
taking law courses.

I'll suggest you read Pierce v. Delamater, a case in the NY Court of Appeals 
for September 1847.

Carl
KM1H 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>