| To: | dhallam@knology.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using? |
| From: | David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:28:58 +0100 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On 20 June 2012 20:08, David C. Hallam <dhallam@knology.net> wrote: > It's my understand that a 4CX1500B is a direct replacement for a > 4CX1000A with a plus that it has an extra 500W dissipation capability. > > David > KW4DH I don't think they are as similar as you think. The 4CX1500B is a better tube overall. See data sheeets on my site - www.g8wrb.org dave _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, Steve Katz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, David C. Hallam |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, Steve Katz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, David C. Hallam |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |