Amps
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?

from [k7fm] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <donroden@hiwaay.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?
From: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Reply-to: k7fm <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:04:20 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> 
Then why does the new ACOM 1500 use the 4CX1000A 

1.  Cheaper
2.  Manufactured by some companies that do not make the 4CX1500
3.  Less filament current
4.  Less air restriction, so a smaller blower can be used.

73,  Colin  K7FM
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, donroden
Next by Date:  [Amps] Use of 12V/115V inverter to power small tube amp?, David Feldman
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, donroden
Next by Thread:  Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B's -- worth using?, Carl
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]