Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Multi-Amp w/ Power Combiners

To: g8on@fsmail.net
Subject: Re: [Amps] Multi-Amp w/ Power Combiners
From: "Jerry Kaidor" <jerry@tr2.com>
Reply-to: jerry@tr2.com
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
> How do you ensure phase matching between the amplifiers?

*** Well, they're both fed with the same signal.  If they're the same
sort of amp, tuned the same, the phase should be the same, right?

                          - Jerry Kaidor, KF6VB

>
>
>
>
>
> ========================================
> Message Received: Aug 23 2012, 01:16 PM
> From: "Sam Carpenter"
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Cc:
> Subject: [Amps] Multi-Amp w/ Power Combiners
>
> I have often thought of why I do not see the running of multiple HF Tube
> amps with power combining networks. It would seem that the overall cost of
> using more than one smaller amplifier would be a net savings because of
> the
> relatively low cost of building medium power amps. It seems like a
> reasonable way to build a lot of power and spread the stress of a system
> out
> a bit to lower priced components. It also partially eliminates the single
> point of failure to take all the power down with a single glitch. I
> understand that frequency agility would be more cumbersome and time
> consuming, but in many applications, you don't move much. Neither input
> nor
> output combining is complicated so long as you are staying fairly put with
> regard to frequency. Does anybody do this outside of broadcasting and
> commercial? N9FUT
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>