To: | Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Machlett or RF Parts 3-500 |
From: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:47:12 -0600 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
I'll bet the only difference is what's printed on the glass. Therefore, what matters in the purchase decision is who is selling what, meaning the warranty details and price. Rob K5UJ On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net> wrote: > Looking for opinions on Machlett or RF Parts 3-500 tubes? Which would you > buy? The Machlett is slightly less expensive. I know they are made in the > same factory. > _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Machlett or RF Parts 3-500, Jim W7RY |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] conductive grease for roller inductor, Eddy Swynar |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Machlett or RF Parts 3-500, Jim W7RY |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] Heathkit SB-1000 Arcing, Thomas F Giella NZ4O |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |