The amp came already modified with the 3cx800s. It was done up by W4EMF. One
of my EBay finds that has found my bench.
From: Mark - K4SO
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 10:09 PM
To: Chris Miller
Subject: Re: [Amps] looking for assistance with MLA-2500 tank circuit rework
On 12/31/2012 8:54 PM, Chris Miller wrote:
Yes that is the technique that I was using. I was using a miniVNA box, but
that should be ok.
I pulled the value of the resistor off of a spec sheet for the tubes that I
downloaded, however the sheet is not clear as to whether or not they were
showing specs for one or two tubes. Although, as I look at the specs here
again, it has to be for two tubes as they show 1100W PEP input while in the max
ratings it shows 800W max plate dissipation. However, I have very limited
experience with playing with tube spec sheets. My schooling was during the
transition period between discreet components and large scale IC so there was
not a lot of tube training.
I thought I had looked at the spec for the 8875 to compare, but I can not
remember now. I may have just given it a quick glance to check the capacitance
values. Likely explains the harshness that I seemed to note on its signal on
the monitor receiver I had running during the dummy load test. It probably was
beating the hell out of the filtering. I will have to figure a way of
preventing that, that is, something that is a hard limit rather than leaning on
the ALC hard. As I look at the manual specs it does look like they were
trashing the heck out of it on sideband. they show 2000W PEP input while
showing 1000 W DC input CW
I am going to find that 8875 spec sheet again.
From: Mark - K4SO
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 4:23 PM
To: Chris Miller
Subject: Re: [Amps] looking for assistance with MLA-2500 tank circuit rework
On 12/28/2012 10:49 PM, Chris Miller wrote:
Hi to all,
I have taken on a project that has been bugging me for a bit. I have a
MLA2500 that I picked up that has been retrofitted with a pair of 3cx800
intending to have a transportable amp. From what I have read the tubes are
supposed to be a close match for the original tubes, as far as tube specs go.
However, I have found that the amp on 160 through 40 has to have the load
control set to 1 to get close to load on power. 20 through 10 appeared to work
o.k.
I decided to sweep the tank through the antenna, with a 2.7k ohm resistor
in place on the anode to simulate tube load and found that resonances appeared
off on lower bands. Figuring I had a good handle on the process, I prototyped
up a new tank coil to make mistakes on. I then playing with tap points and
turns until I achieved what looked like a good set of patterns for each band,
for the range of tuning.
When I attempted to test my results, on dummy load conditions, all bands
are now showing insufficient capacitance for load on all bands with a little
bit of range at near max capacity on 10 near the upper end of the band.
Since that seemed to be an epic failure, I must be missing steps in the
process. Is there something I should be watching for or doing so that what I
see as tank resonance actually lands where it should on real world testing? Am
I now at the point where I have to do some trial additions of capacitance to
the load control? Is this amp worth the effort to make it work properly
(realizing it is a bit of a sardine can in there)? Has anyone else done the
retrofit on these amps to the 3cx800 tubes, like this amp has, and did the amp
still resonate as the original tubes did?
Thanks for any help
Chris VE3CEA
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
Chris,
I used this technique for a 6M amp, with a pair of 4CX250Bs, and it was
amazingly accurate. Things are a lot touchier at those frequencies, and a
couple stray pfs can make a difference.
I used an MFJ-259B, looking for 1:1 SWR, while holding the TR relay closed.,
but I must admit that the value of resistor used for tube simulation is now a
distant memory (in other words, I have no idea, hi).
I'm just encouraging you that the technique will work, at least in my
particular circumstances.
I do note that the MLA2500, while often used to create some pretty large
output wattage figures, used a pair of tubes rated at less than the dissipation
of just one 3CX800. The 8875 was rates at 300W plate dissipation. If you get
this thing going, I think you'll cook the power supply in pretty short order,
unless you keep the throttle back. I think a lot of the 8875 tube failures were
because they would produce a fair amount of power without much overhead (or
really well beyond their ratings), until they popped.
Maybe someone can verify the value of the simulator resistor. Oh, I assume
you put the cabinet back on as well...
I do see the Cout is almost the same for the two tubes.
HNY es GL,
73, Mark - K4SO
Chris,
Well, I'm a hobbyist only, so my tube knowledge is not formal. OTOH, the spec.
sheet for the 8875 is for the 8873 (conduction cooled), 8874, traditional
convection cooled, as in up from the bottom, and out from the top, and the
8875, which is a cross flow scheme. The tube is basically the same, but the
cooling does affect the dissipation. The 8875 is only 300W per tube. They were
thrashed, but that's Dentron in those days, and when the tubes were plentiful
and not prohibitively expensive, I guess it was more reasonable. I remember the
heyday of this amp thougth, and guys were pretty satisfied with themselves
about the power output. Still, a pair of 8874s in an Alpha in that era, was
not expected to put out as much power, but could. They always left more
headroom. I had 3 of the 3-tube Alphas running 8874s, and they would run 150W
out, esp. on sideband, almost indefinitely. but that would have been twice the
plate dissipation...
Here are the spec. sheets I was using:
http://www.g8wrb.org/data/Eimac/8873.pdf
I was assuming you had the 3CX800s available, and they fit the sockets, so that
is why you were using them, wth a filament transformer swap. I wished I'd put a
pair in my Alpha 78, instead of jumping to the 89, and they are nice,
low-drive, tubes that make good power. I have a pair of pulls for spares. so
I'm going with them for as long as they'll carry me.
Your technique is good, and will work, so double check the specs, and stay with
it.
GL agn!
73, Mark - K4SO
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|