To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube? |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:28:53 -0600 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
I'm layout out a 160m legal limit AB1 amplifier design using two parallel 833-C tubes, and a thought occurred to me: Why are two parasitic suppressors always needed (one for each tube)? Of course, it's not like the cost for an extra suppressor is going to matter. It would just be easier in this application to use just one. (long story). 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Hammond Manufacturing to take over P.W. Dahl Transformer Line, Paul Christensen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Peter Dahl transformers, Carl |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Which 12V VHF Device, David Shapiro |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?, Carl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |