Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 572b

To: Jeff Blaine <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 572b
From: MU 4CX250B <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 16:32:00 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I'm afraid I don't understand why the plate dissipation would affect
longevity, provided the tubes have adequate cooling. Exceeding rated
grid current or plate current, or using the wrong filament voltage
could kill the tubes, as could  inadequate cooling, but I don't see
why running the tubes at their rated dissipation with plenty of air
would shorten tube life, if all other tube parameters were within
specs,
73,
Jim w8zr
Sent from my iPhone

On May 2, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Jeff Blaine <keepwalking188@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I have used about 8 of the Chinese 572 specifically for torture testing in 
> RTTY service and I can say without qualification that the plate dissipation 
> limit (IIRC 160w) is not something which will keep the tube in long service. 
> But whipping the hell out of these tubes in AM/FM/RTTY service with all the 
> guns blazing is not the common application.
>
> I would expect the current breed to give long SSB service as long as tuning 
> is done properly and kept to a minimum.  For CW, almost as well.  From there, 
> it goes down hill fast.
>
> Comparing them with prior generations makes no sense because there are 
> virtually zero NOS old tubes remaining.  You either buy the Chinese (through 
> some direct or distribution method) - and that is the only source available 
> and take what service life you can get.  Or you can flip to another tube type 
> at some considerable amount of work and expense.
>
> 73/jeff/ac0c
> www.ac0c.com
> alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
>
> -----Original Message----- From: L L bahr
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 5:00 PM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572b
>
> If quality control is so poor, how do you test for longevity or robustness? 
> Just checking the emission when new may have nothing to do with longevity. 
> I'd like to know how well a Chinese 572B will hold up compared to a Cetron 
> 572B.  I wonder what short cuts the manufacturer has taken in production when 
> many new ones go out the door with poor emission. What else is wrong with 
> them?   Maybe it's time for these amplifiers to be retrofitted with other 
> type tubes.
>
> Lee, w0vt
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> There's no doubt that the manufacturer is the problem, but since they are the 
> only one making them  and most Ham's just need a few, a reputable distributer 
> is very important in the supply chain.  He tests them before selling them to 
> be confident that they worked when they left his facility, that is one of the 
> reasons he is considered reputable.  It costs more, but he must becompensated 
> for his time.  A reputable dealer is paramount in buying a tube you know has 
> a decent chance of being good, andis the one thing you can do anything 
> about-choose who you buy from !! Cheers,  Matt 73AD7XN
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>