| To: | Amps <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem is NOT Common Impedance Coupling |
| From: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Jun 2013 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Jim Brown has ridiculed my suggestion that the 'Pin 1' problem is a subset of the 'Common Impedance Coupling' problem. Strangely enough, this has not best pleased me, and I have in no way changed my opinion. Jim now categorically states that "The Pin One Problem is NOT Common Impedance Coupling". In 2003 Jim presented a paper entitled " ... Common Impedance Coupling (the "Pin 1 Problem") ... ". One or both of these positions are incorrect. Perhaps Jim could do me the courtesy of explaining which? 73 Roger VE3ZI _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Cable shielding and grounding paper, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] looking for a matched pair of MRF- 422, dan |
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Cable shielding and grounding paper, Larry Benko |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem is NOT Common Impedance Coupling, Carl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |