To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem is NOT Common Impedance Coupling |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Sat, 08 Jun 2013 21:31:41 -0700 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On 6/8/2013 9:47 AM, Roger Parsons wrote: One or both of these positions are incorrect. Perhaps Jim could do me the courtesy of explaining which? Sorry Roger. My error. Yes, inside the box it's common impedance coupling. And I did NOT ridicule you. My posts are not intended as ridicule (except for one earlier in the week, directed specifically at two closed minds). :) 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Pin 1, Ed K0KL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem is NOT Common Impedance Coupling, Carl |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] looking for a matched pair of MRF- 422, dan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |