Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] S/S Amp's

To: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>, "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] S/S Amp's
From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:14:42 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
  Synchronous detection requires either a carrier, can be reduced in amplitude, 
 to lock on or a somewhat complex
quadrature phase detection system to lock the BFO by maintaining an in-phase
relationship between the upper sideband and lower sideband.
  73
Bill wa4lav


________________________________________
From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of qrv@kd4e.com 
[qrv@kd4e.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:14 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] S/S Amp's

Why are Hams still rf-spamming 160 & 80m with AM carriers
when a DSB suppressed-carrier signal is just as good, uses
less power, and may be sync-detected to remove flutter, etc?

I know, I know, ... never mind ... sigh.

> Jim said;
>
> "It sure would be nice to just rectify the 120vac from the wall plug, with
> or without any isolation xfmr"
>
> It's already in production.
>
> Not quite what you're after but... <http://www.k7dyy.com/>
> http://www.k7dyy.com/
>
> David G4ZOW



--

Thanks! & 73, KD4E.com

David Colburn - Nevils, Georgia USA

Search with: duckduckgo.com

Android for Hams: groups.yahoo.com/group/hamdroid
Creative Tech: groups.yahoo.com/group/ham-macguyver
Raspi Alternative: groups.yahoo.com/group/beagleboneblack/

Restored to design-spec at Heaven's gate 1Cor15:22
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>