Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 136, Issue 42

To: Ed K0KL <edk0kl@centurytel.net>, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 136, Issue 42
From: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Reply-to: g8on@fsmail.net
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:42:10 +0200
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Reversing the polarity of the DC filament supply occasionally will mitigate the 
effects of metal migration, which is exacerbated by high current density and 
high temperatures.

So it makes good sense.

73

Peter G3RZP


========================================
 Message Received: Apr 26 2014, 10:58 PM
 From: "Ed K0KL" <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
 To: amps@contesting.com
 Cc: 
 Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 136, Issue 42
 
 I seem to recall the manual on a 1940's vintage 50 kw transmitter used 
 DC on the filament.
 There was a recommendation to reverse the DC every so often to equalize 
 the work on the
 filament wire ... I am old, it's really from the way- back machine, but 
 I do remember recommendations
 about reversing filament voltage on DC filaments every now and again...
 
 Just more to think about, not sure if it means anything at this point
 
 73
 ed K0KL
 
 
 On 4/26/2014 11:00 AM, amps-request@contesting.com wrote:
 > Send Amps mailing list submissions to
 >      amps@contesting.com
 >
 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 >      http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 >      amps-request@contesting.com
 >
 > You can reach the person managing the list at
 >      amps-owner@contesting.com
 >
 > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 > than "Re: Contents of Amps digest..."
 >
 >
 > Today's Topics:
 >
 >     1. low pass filter fail ;) (Benedikt Sveinsson)
 >     2. Re: WEIRD ONE SOLVED (Bryan Swadener via Amps)
 >     3. Filament Voltage Question (John Lyles)
 >     4. FW:  Filament Voltage Question (Matt)
 >
 >
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > Message: 1
 > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:49:47 +0000
 > From: Benedikt Sveinsson <benedikt@ok.is>
 > To: Amps <amps@contesting.com>
 > Subject: [Amps] low pass filter fail ;)
 > Message-ID: <B579991C234CB04F9D4C9EAE8AC57A49492CC1@OK-MAIL.ok.is>
 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
 >
 > I have been building a 2M SSPA - final part in the puzzle has been the low 
 > pass filter.
 >
 > After building this filter, copied the design from W6PQL - but I have 
 > limited resources here in TF land, so I don't have access to good PCB 
 > materials. But the filter was measured using a mini VNA Pro analyser with 
 > good results.  1:1.2 SWR on the operating frequency and cuttoff starts 
 > around 150Mhz
 >
 > well, after transmitting about 10s I noticed a drop in output power, I took 
 > the cover off and aimed the camera while transmitting
 >
 > This is what happened on youtube:  
 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lU3I3BgmkE
 >
 > I suspect there is something else wrong, as this happened very fast 10-15s - 
 > and solder melts!
 >
 > Guess I will go and find teflon sheets and make my own capacitors with 
 > copper ;)
 >
 >
 > 73, Benni TF3CY
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > Message: 2
 > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
 > From: Bryan Swadener via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
 > To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
 > Subject: Re: [Amps] WEIRD ONE SOLVED
 > Message-ID:
 >      <1398471587.59031.YahooMailNeo@web122104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 >
 > And no more 60Hz hum from feeding the bias thru the
 > filament xfmr CT.
 >
 > vy 73,
 > Bryan WA7PRC
 >
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:50:07 -0400
 > From: Bill VE3NH
 > Subject: [Amps] WEIRD ONE SOLVED
 >
 > The negative lead of the bias board should have been grounded
 > instead of attaching to B- since the GI7-B has an indirectly heated
 > cathode whose pin is common to one side of the filament.
 >
 > Bottom line: everything now works as it should.
 > Now, bring on the 6M DX!? Thanks again, Paul.
 >
 > Bill VE3NH
 >
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > Message: 3
 > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:39:25 -0600
 > From: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
 > To: amps@contesting.com
 > Subject: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
 > Message-ID: <535B468D.9030706@losalamos.com>
 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 >
 > When direct heated filaments of thoriated tungsten (usually 1-2% thoria)
 > have a lot of hours of operation (thousands), they become brittle and
 > easy to break. Older tubes are much more prone to shipping damage from
 > broken filaments for this reason. Grain growth occurs in the
 > microstructure of the metal. Thin higher voltage filaments would be even
 > more fragile in this condition. Large filament wires or bars can be
 > modified in thickness along the length to try and create a more uniform
 > temperature and electron emission. Near the bottom, the leads help
 > conduct heat away and reduce the temperature. By necking down the wire,
 > the temperature at this point can be raised. Lots of tricks like this
 > are possible with fat high current filament structures.
 >
 > The filaments in the RCA 7835 are 96 vertical bars, each carrying ~70
 > amperes DC. End result is a 5 VDC filament with 6800 amperes of current.
 > The RCA 4616 has a similar complex of vertical bars, much smaller, and
 > has a terminal voltage of 0.95 VAC!
 >
 > 73
 > John
 > K5PRO
 > -------------
 >
 > There is another issue too: With a directly heated cathode (filament),
 > there is an unintentional bias across the filament. Whether using AC or
 > DC, one end of the filament will be more negative than the other and
 > that adds a grid-cathode bias to the equation. With DC the bias is
 > constant, with AC it alternates of course. More anode current will be
 > emitted from the negative end and less from the positive end.
 >
 > I don't know if this causes any actual harm, but I can't imagine it
 > helping any.
 >
 > 73, Bill W6WRT
 >
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > Message: 7
 > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:13:26 -0600
 > From: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
 > To: "'Fuqua, Bill L'" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>,    <amps@contesting.com>
 > Subject: Re: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
 > Message-ID: <00ad01cf5e5e$f1790250$d46b06f0$@miamioh.edu>
 > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
 >
 > Good point, Bill. I hadn't thought of that, but that's obviously a
 > consideration for VHF/UHF tubes with directly heated cathodes.
 > Jim
 >
 >   >
 >   > --------------------------------------------
 >   > On Tue, 4/22/14, Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> wrote:
 >   >
 >   >  Subject: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
 >   >  To: amps@contesting.com
 >   >  Date: Tuesday, April 22, 2014, 8:19 AM
 >   >
 >   >  I was reading the data sheet this
 >   >  morning on the 4CX3500A and noticed the
 >   >  filament requirements are 5V@90Amps.  It occurred to me
 >   >  that I've never
 >   >  understood why so many tubes with indirectly heated cathodes
 >   >  have such
 >   >  low-voltage - high current filaments. Since the only thing
 >   >  the filament is
 >   >  used for is to heat the cathode, then why not design it to
 >   >  run at, e.g.,
 >   >  115V@4A? That sure would be a lot easier to implement. I'm
 >   >  sure there's a
 >   >  reason, howevrr, and would appreciate somebody informing of
 >   >  it!
 >   >
 >   >  73,
 >   >
 >   >  Jim W8ZR
 >
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > Message: 4
 > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 02:15:23 -0500
 > From: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
 > To: <amps@contesting.com>
 > Subject: [Amps] FW:  Filament Voltage Question
 > Message-ID: <14f101cf611f$4aff75d0$e0fe6170$@gmail.com>
 > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
 >
 > I am perhaps confused.  In my experience, grain growth generally produces
 > increased ductility and improved (or restored depending on your point of
 > view) yield strength more-or-less according to the Hall-Patch relationship
 > (yield strength is proportional to the square root of grain size).  It would
 > seem that grain refinement, not growth, would contribute to increased
 > brittleness.
 >
 > Matt
 > KM5VI
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Lyles
 > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:39 AM
 > To: amps@contesting.com
 > Subject: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
 >
 > When direct heated filaments of thoriated tungsten (usually 1-2% thoria)
 > have a lot of hours of operation (thousands), they become brittle and easy
 > to break. Older tubes are much more prone to shipping damage from broken
 > filaments for this reason. Grain growth occurs in the microstructure of the
 > metal. Thin higher voltage filaments would be even more fragile in this
 > condition. Large filament wires or bars can be modified in thickness along
 > the length to try and create a more uniform temperature and electron
 > emission. Near the bottom, the leads help conduct heat away and reduce the
 > temperature. By necking down the wire, the temperature at this point can be
 > raised. Lots of tricks like this are possible with fat high current filament
 > structures.
 >
 > The filaments in the RCA 7835 are 96 vertical bars, each carrying ~70
 > amperes DC. End result is a 5 VDC filament with 6800 amperes of current.
 > The RCA 4616 has a similar complex of vertical bars, much smaller, and has a
 > terminal voltage of 0.95 VAC!
 >
 > 73
 > John
 > K5PRO
 > -------------
 >
 > There is another issue too: With a directly heated cathode (filament), there
 > is an unintentional bias across the filament. Whether using AC or DC, one
 > end of the filament will be more negative than the other and that adds a
 > grid-cathode bias to the equation. With DC the bias is constant, with AC it
 > alternates of course. More anode current will be emitted from the negative
 > end and less from the positive end.
 >
 > I don't know if this causes any actual harm, but I can't imagine it helping
 > any.
 >
 > 73, Bill W6WRT
 >
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > Message: 7
 > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:13:26 -0600
 > From: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
 > To: "'Fuqua, Bill L'" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>,    <amps@contesting.com>
 > Subject: Re: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
 > Message-ID: <00ad01cf5e5e$f1790250$d46b06f0$@miamioh.edu>
 > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
 >
 > Good point, Bill. I hadn't thought of that, but that's obviously a
 > consideration for VHF/UHF tubes with directly heated cathodes.
 > Jim
 >
 >   >
 >   > --------------------------------------------
 >   > On Tue, 4/22/14, Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> wrote:
 >   >
 >   >  Subject: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question  >  To: amps@contesting.com  >
 > Date: Tuesday, April 22, 2014, 8:19 AM  >  >  I was reading the data sheet
 > this  >  morning on the 4CX3500A and noticed the  >  filament requirements
 > are 5V@90Amps.  It occurred to me  >  that I've never  >  understood why so
 > many tubes with indirectly heated cathodes  >  have such  >  low-voltage -
 > high current filaments. Since the only thing  >  the filament is  >  used
 > for is to heat the cathode, then why not design it to  >  run at, e.g.,  >
 > 115V@4A? That sure would be a lot easier to implement. I'm  >  sure there's
 > a  >  reason, howevrr, and would appreciate somebody informing of  >  it!
 >   >
 >   >  73,
 >   >
 >   >  Jim W8ZR
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Amps mailing list
 > Amps@contesting.com
 > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 >
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > Subject: Digest Footer
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Amps mailing list
 > Amps@contesting.com
 > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------
 >
 > End of Amps Digest, Vol 136, Issue 42
 > *************************************
 >
 >
 
 
 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com
 
 _______________________________________________
 Amps mailing list
 Amps@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>