Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Solid State Amps

To: Chris Wilson <chris@chriswilson.tv>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid State Amps
From: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:23:13 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Chris,

The industry standard dot matrix display is a great idea, but what
chance manufacturers agree to such a selfless act of kindness to us
end users? ;) Individuality has its costs...

I'm not sure if perhaps you misinterpreted my "industry standard dot matrix display" concept. I don't mean that Kenwood, Icom, Vertex, etc, should define a standard shared by them! What I do mean is using _existing_ industry standard displays, instead of special displays custom-made for each radio model. So the manufacturers of ham equipment don't need to agree.

The displays I mean range from small, single line, 16 character ones, over 2 line, 4 line, all the way to graphics-capable ones. Their electrical interfaces are so well standardized that one can usually be swapped for another with little or no changes, and they exist in several more or less standard physical sizes.

If just one manufacturer sells radios built just from standard parts, with nothing critical customized in any way, and the buyers prefer those radios over any using special parts, it would be a win-win situation, and the other manufacturers would be forced to follow.

But of course this scheme fails, because 98% of all hams buy radios without the slightest regard for long-term maintainability, and aren't even able to tell a custom display from a standard one! And since custom displays are usually prettier than standard ones, radios with custom displays sell better...

Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>