To: | "Ray Day" <rayday@cox.net>, <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Comments solicited on AL-82 amp |
From: | "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com> |
Date: | Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:31:31 -0400 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
The AL-82 has had a long history of expensive tube arcs since the Chinese
3-500's dont hi-pot even close to the Eimacs and they arent gettered as well
either in production.
Later models added a surge resistor in the HV line to minimize current (and damage) until a fuse blows or the event has passed. BUT NOT running the amp often enough to get a nice red glow on the anodes will continue to cause gas arcs. The getter material is on the anode surface and is activated by the heat. New tubes especially need this done for several hours and if you have the electronic bias option it defeats the purpose a lot. The large Ameritrons are also known for opening up a electrolytic equalizing resistor and blowing that cap as well as others suddenly letting loose as the unloaded HV is always too close to the maximum cap rating to be safe; all it takes is a small line surge to go bang. The exact same PS is in all 3 big amps. Adding another cap or two with resistors is fairly easy or just replace the PS board with one that is built for Snap In caps and use 8 270uF 500V 105C. Mouser and Digi Key carry several good brands. Ameritron upgraded cap values several times over the decades and now uses 270uF. ANOTHER Ameritron problem is the step start fails and the result is often a blown transformer. The cause is an unknown number of amps that were miswired, and the relay contacts weld shut. Ameritron came up with a fix but would not acknowledge that they caused the failure. A few owners got all new parts under warranty however; one I know of failed right out of the box. In any case none of those AL-82/1200/1500 amps agree with the schematic. Ameritron no longer uses Dahl transformers and the new ones by Indiana Transformer havent been around long enough to get a long term reliability score. I would NEVER run the boost winding on the AL-82 (with added electrolytics first) as the chance of 3-500 failures has increased dramatically at 4KV. Besides the added power wont be heard at the other end with any of those 3 amps. The AL-1500 8877 could also get a bit unstable as no parasitic suppressor is used and even Eimac tubes have been known to fail at 4KV from an internal arc. The small power boost isnt worth it. Carl KM1H----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Day" <rayday@cox.net> To: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:06 AM Subject: [Amps] Comments solicited on AL-82 amp Hi all, Ray N6HE here... I'm in the market for an amp to replace my deterioratingSB-220. I love the (2) 3-500 in grounded-grid configuration characteristicsand am looking for a full legal limit not-too-expensive tube (not solid state) amp. I'm aware of MFJ/Ameritron's spotty history with workmanshipquality and will check out anything from them carefully. I'd rather buy new as opposed to used. $3,000 or less is my budget. Have a special 220VAC line already run for the SB-220. I've reviewed the eHam Reviews (not much "meat"in them) for it but respect the knowledge of this group much more. I'd appreciate any comments from members the group with their experience (including if there are any odd things to especially be on the lookout forwhen using it) with the AL-82 - and of course any other amp recommendationswithin the parameters above. Thanks in advance, 73, Ray N6HE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8445 - Release Date: 10/24/14 _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 142, Issue 49, Bill Turner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] Transformer needed, Roger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Comments solicited on AL-82 amp, Kimberly Elmore |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 142, Issue 49, Gary Smith via Amps |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |