Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter

To: Amps group <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:11:19 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Given that the rule at the time was based on input power to the final stage, it 
begs the question of how could they possibly know without being in your shack?  
Granted, enforcement then was a far cry from now with station audits not 
unusual.

Today it's hard enough to get the FCC to enforce rules against deliberate 
interference.
 
Al
AB2ZY
________________________________________
From: Amps <amps-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Bill Turner 
<dezrat@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM
To: Amps group
Subject: Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter

------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Mon, 04 May 2015 09:28:07 -0400, you wrote:

>   I can think of a very fine reason, to prove to the authorities,
>should the need arise, that you are not in violation of the rule.
>And to prove that you are in command of the facility to maintain
>your output power within your limit.
>--
>   Ron  KA4INM - Youvan's corollary:
>                 Every action results in unwanted side effects.

REPLY:

When I was a new ham back in the late 1950's, the FCC issued a number
of citations for excess power and the details were printed in QST.  As
I recall, some of the citations were for very small transgressions of
the 1kW limit, some as small as ten to twenty watts or so. It made
enough of an impression that I remember it still.

For what it's worth.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>