Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 170, Issue 4

To: amps <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 170, Issue 4
From: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Reply-to: ka4inm@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:30:40 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
  On 02/07/2017 12:16 AM, Jim Brown wrote:

Is this post from a ham?  I don't see a call anywhere. Not in the spirit
of the ham radio that I grew up with and still try to practice.
/* snip */

  There are a lot of misconceptions in the two HAM radio societies.

  One is "last names" some think they are not allowed, when actually we
are automatically on a first name (and call) basis with all other hams.

  Another is the use of assigned call signs other than when required.
(after 10 minutes, every 10 minutes and at the end of every QSO)
  The uses otherwise is simply a matter of pride.
--
  Ron  KA4INM - Youvan's corollary:
                Every action results in unwanted side effects.
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>