Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Glitch resistor + fuse?

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Glitch resistor + fuse?
From: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
Reply-to: jtml@vla.com
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 23:35:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
In very high power amplifiers for pulsed RF service, I use active crowbars. With 15-25 kV plate voltages, I use triggered mercury Ignitrons. Right now we are evaluating a stack of big thyristors, 85 mm diameter hockey puck devices. In either case, these crowbars fire in less than 5 microseconds and completely protect the tube(s) by diverting the current from stored energy away from the tube spark. I always test the crowbar after repairs and at least once a year. A 29 AWG magnet wire of some length is shorted across the power supply output terminals, by a remote Ross HV relay. I have measured 32,000 amps in the crowbar device when it fired across a 30 kV supply with 240 uF. Its not pleasant when the crowbar does not trigger when the test wire is applied. Deafening sound and bright flash through the window. The crowbar logic must also turn off the power supply as quickly as possible to prevent blown mains fuses and excess fault currents on the rectifiers. Relays delay this at least mS, but we try to open a Jennings vacuum contactor (three phase) in just over a powerline cycle.

Applying such experience to amateur radio power supplies, if you put the shunt thyristor device(s) in between two 'glitch' resistors, (break value in two) so that it is in middle of a voltage divider where the tube spark has ~50 volt drop, and the power supply voltage is at the other end, the crowbar device will continue to remain clamped until voltage is down to 50 volts. Worse thing is to put the crowbar device at the load end of the glitch resistor where voltage is only about 50 volts during a spark.

If you can find a fast current transformer like a Pearson from surplus or Ebay, they are typically used to sense the current in the B+ line and fire the logic that triggers the crowbar. The CT will put out a large spike of voltage when 60 Amps flows, so best to look for something with a 0.1V/A sensitivity. You can also build something. Can also use a low value resistor shunt in the bottom of the power supply to ground, to sense the overcurrent and fire a crowbar.

If your glitch resistor is good enough, then you don't need a crowbar. Best to test it either way, using the magnet wire approach recommended in the Eimac note (and other tube manufacturers supply similar guidance). I would wonder if a HV fuse breaks the plasma when it blows, fast enough.
73
John
K5PRO

Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 00:26:36 +0000
From: Alan Ibbetson <alan@g3xaq.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Glitch resistor + fuse?

Eimac's recommendation for fault protection
http://www.cpii.com/docs/library/9/AB17%20Fault%20Protection.pdf
suggests fragile tubes (I guess 8877?) need the energy in a flashover to be
limited to 4 Joules. Eimac's figure of 50V across the arc and Jim's 2ms for
the HT fuse to open with a 3KV PSU and 50 ohm glitch resistor gives 60A
fault current and  50V*60A*2ms = 6J, so a bit too much. However the 3-500Z
being discussed in this thread is very probably more robust than an 8877.

Jim: how did you measure the 2ms fuse opening time? I can't see it is all
that easy with a multi-kilovolt supply dumping many tens of amps through
the fuse and glitch resitor!

I wonder if any US readers use a crowbar circuit as described in the Eimac
paper to really cut down on the energy a valve has to endure during an arc?
There is the outline of a circuit using a string of thyristors (SCRs) in
figure 2 here
http://www.qsl.net/oe5jfl/flashover.htm

although the circuit does not offer protection during the first half
second, until the gate trigger reservoir capacitor has charged up. It also
may not keep the thyristors triggered for 20ms or more, until after the
primary-side relay/breaker/contactor has dropped out. A better approach
might be to use transformer coupled gate triggering, driven from the low
voltage DC supply that is already provided for the control logic. Some kind
of pulse train circuit (NE555?) would be needed to keep the thyristors
triggered during the "follow on" phase.
73, Alan G3XAQ

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>