Hi Joe
Yes, i know, there are many odds againt it beeing a perfect antenna. But
that how it is with this super limited space. But what im going for is some
vertical radiation, to get some low angale radiation as alternative to the
dipol who has some limitations when it comes to DX.
--
OZ1AXG Flam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe, aa4nn" <aa4nn@earthlink.net>
To: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>; "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Cc: <antennaware@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper
> Dr OM Flam,
> Not only does the tower affect your INV L, now you have
> let us know of the 80m slopers and another 160m antenna.
> These wire antennas have drastically more influence on
> your INV L than you ever thought the tower would have.
> In the end you may get a pretty good match with low
> SWR on your INV L but your radiation pattern will be
> so convoluted you'll never know where your signal is
> going. hi
> 73, Joe, aa4nn
>
>>Yes the distance to the tower has influenced the matching a lot ...
>>besides
>>the 22.5 tower theres also two 80 meter sloopers and 1 inverted V 160
>>meter
>>dipole - altogether making the antenna electrical longer. Its a compromise
>>to get room for all the stuff up there :=) The 60 KHz difference in
>>resonanse frequence, to the calculated values, might be explained by all
>>this extra "top loading" capacity.
>>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.2/1689 - Release Date: 9/24/2008
6:51 PM
_______________________________________________
Antennaware mailing list
Antennaware@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
|