| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) |
|---|---|
| From: | abrogdon@arrl.org (Brogdon, Al, W1AB) |
| Date: | Fri Mar 7 09:21:00 1997 |
>From: martin38945
>To: cq-contest
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?)
>
>"How come CT doesn't recognize T1?"
_______________
Herr Martin,
We in CT have recognized T1 since the Treaty of 1810.5. "Und why?" you
might ask. Simple--to get the added multiplier, even if the note IS very
bad.
Al, 599 CT
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CT Master.DTA, Dan Weisenburger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Update's QSL Routes CQWW 1996, Pascual.Guardiola@inte.haci.carm.es |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?), Randy Thompson |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Novice/Tech in DX contests, Dan Robbins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |