Hello Joe,
There are cheaters. Be sure of that. Some are outright cheating and
others have unique interpretations of rules which they think are defendable.
It's going to happen in any event, the only thing being different is how
many are doing it. Some may be minor offenses, while others are major.
Before anyone asks, No, I don't know any specific instances, but you can be
sure it's happening. You would be extremely naive to think otherwise.
As far as the nasty input you got from some, just like there are cheaters,
there are insensitive, nasty people out there who deserve the destain of
all.
You can disagree without being disagreeable.
I saw some responses which took exception to statements by others, but they
were presented as they should be.
73 de Steve, NJ4F
At 10:40 PM 12/9/97 -0800, Joe Humet wrote:
>Ok I give up.
>My tail is burned enough. It seems that no one else has a problem with
>this. So,I guess I was wrong.. I did not mean to inply that anyone was
>cheating, nor did I ever say that or think that... I just felt that
>They should be in another class. Thats all.
>Boy thats the last time I make a comment here. You should see some of
>the things I have been called.. Oh Well if they are flaming me they are
>leaving some one else alone..
>Tnx again for your opinions and input.
>73 and Good Contesting.
>Merry Christmas and a VERY happy New Year.
>
>Joe K2DS
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
>
---------------------------------------------
Steve Bookout, NJ4F
Rapidan Data Systems
'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!'
Free demo at http://www.erols.com/pvander
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|