> I agree that it should be inexcusable to creative log QSO's, however How
> much should the pentalty be for putting N6TR in the log as N6RT when
> all the rest of the information is correct. Or getting the check as 87
> instead 78 , (I know that neither are correct just used as an example.)
> Obviously just a typo or getting old with the head bone. YES the Q
> shouldn't count for points but PENTALTY ???
I agree that the difference between these two cases is minimal and
the penalty for both should probably be the same. I have had
discussions with some of the ARRL people, and I believe they are
considering a smaller - uniform - penalty for both types of errors.
There should be the same non-incentive for guessing at a check that
there should be for a callsign.
Tree N6TR
n6tr@contesting.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|