Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc. |
---|---|
From: | tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com) |
Date: | Fri May 7 09:39:53 1999 |
So now we need to do a survey and see if those people using TR with an exchange database did better than those without. This stringent log testing on a contest like SS with lots of ways to go wrong really changes a lot of strategies and the weight of certain techno-intelligence issues. "...not that there's anything wrong with that!" 73, Ty K3MM -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Busted Q's, and similar, n6tr@teleport.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., n6tr@teleport.com |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Relaxed log checking, Marijan Miletic |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., n6tr@teleport.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |