Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc. |
---|---|
From: | n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com) |
Date: | Fri May 7 09:47:03 1999 |
> So now we need to do a survey and see if those people using TR > with an exchange database did better than those without. My experience with this feature is that there are two problems with it: 1. The data changes more from year to year than you error rate. 2. It distracts you too much from listening to what is being sent. For me, I think I have a LOWER error rate without it. 73 Tree N6TR "We don't use the weapons - we just build them". -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., tgstewart@pepco.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Guessing or miscopied?, v31jp@logical123.net |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., tgstewart@pepco.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., Scott Ellington |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |