Why not take the SO2R analogy one or more steps further:
MS was supposed to be a bunch of guys splitting up the 48 hour
op-time of one radio (sounds very civilized to me!) However,
technology has changed that and MS has become 3, 4 or more
stations, one running, the rest tuning for mults. So let's create
MS1radio, MS2radio, MS3radio, etc.
Then do the same for M-2. There's real M-2 (2 radios), M-2-3radio,
M-2-4radios, etc.
Seems the only unscathed category is M-M.
73,
Barry W2UP
On 28 Jan 02, at 11:26, Bill Coleman wrote:
>
> On 1/28/02 10:55 AM, Jim Rhodes at rhodes@evertek.net wrote:
>
> >OK, if there is really no advantage, then why do it?
>
> Skilled SO2R operators may find it to have an advantage. Highly
> skilled SO1R operators may disagree.
>
> Just having the equipment isn't enough -- you have to have the skill.
>
>
>
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
> Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
> -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|