CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] 24 vs 48 - NO NEW CAREGORIES!

Subject: [CQ-Contest] 24 vs 48 - NO NEW CAREGORIES!
From: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri Feb 7 21:06:34 2003
At 10:40 AM 2/7/03 -0500, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
>Jim has a point.
>
>For a 24 hour category to work w/in a 48 hour contest, it would have to be a
>contiguous 24 hour period.  Exactly which one may be up to the contest
>sponsors (ie UTC Saturday only, UTC Sunday Only, or any given 24 hour
>period) but it needs to be one 24 hour block.  Otherwise the "24 hour" gang
>can cherry pick the bands they want to maximize Q's.


That's exactly why this category is potentially interesting.  The strategic 
decisions to be made are part of the fun.


>Or to put it another way, there should be a way of distinguishing, IMHO,
>YMMV, between someone who runs in the 24 Hour category and someone who
>operates 24 Hours in the 48 Hour category.  After all, isn't one of the
>reasons for proposing this category is to accommodate those who only have
>one 24 hour window available to operate on the contest weekend?


No.  It is to encourage people who would only operate 8 or 10 or 12 hours 
to make a 24-hour effort, composed of whatever time they can spare or their 
bodies will let them do.



73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database was updated 1 Feb 03.
Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>