Dave,
Personally, I have no problem with the state party promos.
FQP would be nowhere as popular as it now is without all the
advertising.
It has grown in a very few years to be probably the number
two state event.
I like th ereminders also because i'm getting senile and tend to forget
things. With enough advanced warning I can remember to make plans in advance.
FWIW my $.02
73, Tom K5IID
At 10:43 4/5/03 -0500, David A. Pruett wrote:
>I'm going to ask this question only once, then I will shut up on this subject.
>
>How do the participants in this reflector feel about receiving what
>amounts to press releases about state QSO parties every few days? Is this
>something you don't mind, is it something you're interested in, or is it
>something you find presumptuous and annoying, like the unwanted spam which
>fills our e-mail in-boxes?
>
>I ask this question because I want to establish (if for no one other than
>myself) what the users of this reflector (and moderator) think is appropriate.
>
>The annual "spamming" of CQ-Contest by the sponsors of the Florida QSO
>Party has begun, almost a month before the event occurs. Why they do this
>is understandable - they are trying to promote their event; nothing wrong
>with that.
>
>There are other state QSO parties which are on the schedule before
>FQP. GA is next weekend, MI the following weekend, THEN comes FQP. I'm
>sure the sponsors of these and other state QSO parties are just as
>interested in publicity and promotion. But at the same time let's be
>honest - state QSO parties are the most important to the sponsors, and
>those in the target state.
>
>I am the chairman of the Michigan QSO Party committee. Our philosophy for
>using CQ-Contest to promote our event has been to refrain until the week
>of the contest. Otherwise we confine MiQP announcements to a mailing list
>which we maintain of previous entrants, our e-mail reflector
>(MiQP-Mail@miqp.org) and some targeted mailings to known in-state contesters.
>
>Despite the tone of this note, this is not intended as a blast at the FQP
>folks. I count many of the FCGers who work behind the scenes as friends
>who run a great event and I wish them luck. However, I think they are
>taking advantage of this reflector for purposes of publicity, but if no
>one seems to mind that's OK. If that's the case, then count on MiQP (and
>I would suspect other QSO parties as well) to ratchet up the PR spam. We
>too have organizational activities for the contest going on like an
>on-line map filling in with counties to be activated, in case you're
>interested.
>
>Speaking now as a CQ-Contest subscriber, I would like to see a policy
>where state QSO party announcements are limited to the week of the
>event. This should be plenty to time to establish awareness of the event
>and get people on the air. It will also eliminate PR overlap between
>succeeding events and reduce confusion in the minds of the casual
>participant that we're all trying to attract.
>
>Now I'll QRT on this subject.
>
>73,
>
>Dave/K8CC
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
>THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
"E" Sorter for the ARRL W5 QSL Bureau
Williamstown, WV
|