> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Sylvan Katz
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 09:32
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Packet Use Statement
> > 1. perhaps there really *aren't* that many cheaters
> > 2. people who "abuse" packet choose not to submit logs
> > 3. the cheaters are smarter than everyone thinks
> There is another possibility. The CQ WW detection technique (and
> perhaps any
> technique) is not robust and can only detect blatant cheaters.
> ... Sylvan
There is a fifth as well.
The CQWW detection technique (and perhaps any technique)
is not accurate in detection, providing incorrect or random results.
Unless the technique is open and available for evaluation, I don't
know why anyone should have any faith in the results.
Jeff Maass firstname.lastname@example.org Located near Columbus Ohio
USPSA # L-1192 NROI/CRO Amateur Radio K8ND
Maass' IPSC Resources: http://home.columbus.rr.com/jmaass/index.html
Circleville USPSA/IPSC: http://home.columbus.rr.com/jmaass/pcsiipsc.htm