CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report

To: Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>,CQ Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:07:11 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

But de facto is that those spots shown were put from the listed
ip-number. Eg. several US stations spoting from same ip which is
allocated to the country of spotted DX-station, coincidence?

It's impossible to determine this from the information available to us.


Of course spots with a bogus call does not itself necessary mean
self-spotting. I have myself been "a victim" of this at least in one
occasion. But with the bogus calls from DX-station's region is more
likely selfspotting.

The packet cluster network needs to be redesigned as an authenticated service. End-user authentication makes spoofing and self-spotting much more difficult, and also prevents non-amateurs from injecting traffic that ends up going out over the air. Transport layer (i.e. node-to-node) authentication prevents rogue nodes (e.g., those that don't implement end-user authentication) from connecting to the network.


The same applies to the many "telnet" gateways that let anyone on the internet initiate over-the-air connections.

--lyndon
---------------------------------------------------------------
   The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
      http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>