To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of contesting |
From: | VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk> |
Date: | Tue, 03 Feb 2004 02:12:37 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
W9WI replied to SM2EKM:> Is it legal in the US not to identify for every QSO?
If my recollection is correct & the intent hasn't changed, if a Q lasts longer than 10 minutes, then a US station must ID once every ten minutes during that Q. This tends to support the ID-at-end-of-every-Q conclusion if "communication" = "QSO". That said, I think most of the offenders being cited in this thread are DX stations not under jurisdiction of the US government.
Personally, I like to ID on every Q & rarely find doing so to be detrimental. That said, I'm not an N6TJ or CT1BOH & probably will never be. Perhaps at their level, not IDing can be used strategically, but for the vast majority of everybody else, it's a detriment for all concerned. As well as being contrary to license conditions for probably far more of us than we realize. 73, VR2BrettGraham --------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Passing mults, Mark Beckwith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting - ID'ing, etc., Juhan Poldvere |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Tim Makins, EI8IC |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] First rule -secret of contesting, Warren C. Stankiewicz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |