To: | Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>, "W5PR" <W5PR@swbell.net>,<cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Analysis on ASSISTED advantage vs UNASSISTED |
From: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:16:30 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
At 08:11 AM 4/7/04, Tonno Vahk wrote:
It might seem to you so but actually the rate is slow in WPX, rarely over 110-120 per hour. That allows you to use 2nd radio very efficiently almost not losing anything on the 1st radio. It's tempting to think about running dueling CQs on two bands in WPX, instead of S&P on one, but unless you're really adept, which I'm not, I suppose that could lead to some awkward pauses on both bands at various times. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database is back, at www.pvrc.org --------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] SO3R???, Hanlon, Steve |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Way to go, Ward!!!!, K7LXC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Analysis on ASSISTED advantage vs UNASSISTED, Tonno Vahk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Analysis on ASSISTED advantage vs UNASSISTED, Gary Sutcliffe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |