CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't we need to change the sprint protocol?

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't we need to change the sprint protocol?
From: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:17:04 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hello all:

One very helpful thing to avoid the confusion as to acknowledging Sprint QSOs would be if everyone possible used full QSK. I know a number of very good contest operators who do not like to use QSK, but they are losing out on the opportunity to hear that station who sends a quick R or dit-dit at the end of their Exchange, as well as the one who doubles with them or who was actually calling someone else and calls again while they are transmitting.

I know it may be a distraction with SO2R and that may be a trade-off that you make for SO2R, but I highly recommend that every CW contester use full QSK whenever possible. My doubtful Sprint exchanges or acknowledgements have been significantly reduced since I got an Alpha 78 full QSK amplifier.

73,


John, K4BAI.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>