CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again

To: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:31:52 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:12:25 -0500, Joe Subich, K4IK wrote:

>Only when one has optimized the antenna system does SO2R add 
>significantly to the score.   

_________________________________________________________

You're saying that as if it were proven fact.  Can you give some
evidence?  My *opinion* is just the opposite.  Even out here on the
west coast, I can hear nearly every station on, using a four element
quad at 80 feet.  I doubt that stacked antennas or multiple antenna
systems would gain much (pun intended).  On the other hand, being able
to look for mults on a second band while transmitting could be quite
productive.

In a 48 hour contest, an SO1R station can listen about 24 hours total,
and only on one band at a time.  An SO2R station can listen the whole
48 hours, on multiple bands if desired.  This has got to be a serious
advantage, else why would anyone bother?

--
Bill W6WRT



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>