CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: re:NN2NN

To: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: re:NN2NN
From: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:22:09 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Mal et al:

I thought part 97 explicitely allowed anybody to do anything in an
emergency.  Oddly enough, however, part 97 applies only to an 
amateur radio station:

97.403/97.405
(a) No provision of these rules prevents the use by an amateur station 
in distress of any means at its disposal to attract attention, make 
known its condition and location, and obtain assistance.

97.3
Amateur station. A station in an amateur radio service 
consisting of the apparatus necessary for carrying on 
radiocommunications.

Amateur radio services. The amateur service, the amateur-
satellite service and the radio amateur civil emergency service.

This explicitely allows an "amateur station" in distress to 
transmit anywhere and use any power level.  I wonder whether
the interpretation of "amateur station" in the law requires a
station license?  :-)  I suspect not.

Thanks for sending me back to the rules to look this up.  Interesting.

73,

Mark, KD4D


> I have enclosed a copy of an email I sent to Riley. I was very troubled about 
> these non-amateur communications taking place on 14.300.
> I was also, but did not mention to Riley, how offended I was that any real 
> ham 
> would even suggest he be granted exclusive access to any frequency. It has 
> been 
> suggested by many the WARC bands would be better suited to NN2NN's operation. 
> But, even the WARC bands do not offer exclusive rights to a particular 
> frequency 
> for any group.
> Yes we should all try to make accommodations but without exception every 
> single 
> time I have encroached on one of these 'holy' frequencies I get bombarded by 
> "Get off my Frequency", "I use this frequency every day go somewhere else", I 
> have yet ever in my, almost, 50 years as a ham, had anyone ask politely for 
> me 
> to move. It's always a confrontation especially when it comes to a contest.
> 
> If and when Riley responds I'll post it here immediately.
> 
> MAL           N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: N7MAL 
> To: FCCHAM 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 3:39
> Subject: re:NN2NN
> 
> 
> I have enclosed a recent posting on the contest mailing list. I am 
> particularly 
> concerned about this sentence ""Even non amatuer stations with emergencies 
> have 
> been assisted on 14.300 Mhz. "".
> I have searched, high and low, through Part 97 and can find no authority for 
> such operations. I do find prohibitions against non-amateur communications. 
> While NN2NN's motives are commendable I believe his non-amateur operations 
> are 
> illegal. I believe any station, with any emergency, and a radio capable of 
> operation on 14.300, could and should operate on frequencies allocated for 
> just 
> such emergency communications.
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> 
> MAL             N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
> 
> 
> 
> NN2NN's ORIGINAL POSTING:
> 
> Dear Contesters,
> 
> I have been in many contests over the years. RTTY, CW and SSB. They have 
> helped 
> me sharpen my operating skills.
> And they are fun!
> 
> I am now a Net Control Station for the Intercontinental Amatuer Traffic Net 
> and 
> the Maritime Mobile Service Network that operate on 14.300 MHz. We assist 
> maritime mobile stations, deployed service personel, missionaries abroad and 
> the 
> general Amatuer Radio community pass emergency, medical and priority type 
> traffic from about 1100 until 0200 UTC daily. Even non amatuer stations with 
> emergencies have been assisted on 14.300 Mhz. 
> 
> This posting is to ask you that the next time you operate in a SSB contest to 
> please keep 14.300 MHz in mind when you are looking for a frequency to call 
> CQ. 
> This past weekend with good condx on 20 it was very difficult to pass any 
> traffic.
> 
> Thanks for reading this email and hope you did well in the contest.
> 
> 73,
> Steve NN2NN
> 
> nn2nn@mmsn.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>