CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Station-Specific Incentives

To: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station-Specific Incentives
From: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:41:06 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I've wondered about this. It doesn't fall under the FCC's "pecuniary  
interest" rules? I would think that such things as bottles of wine  
for finishing at a certain level would even be covered under those  
rules, at least in the US...

On Jul 7, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Bill Tippett wrote:

> VE4XT wrote:
>
>> I think it's time we lightened up and looked for real violations  
>> of the
>>
> rules instead of trying to fabricate them where none exists. At a  
> time when
> we should be doing all we can to encourage the use of our  
> frequencies by
> amateurs, that this kind of activity is shat upon is hard to fathom.
>
>          Kelly, the key issue is not Packet, it's station-
> specific incentives (free videos or whatever).  It's
> interesting that there are no contest rules prohibiting
> this and nothing would prevent the following:
>
> *********************NEWS FLASH*********************
>
>                  W1BUX CQWW Multiplier Incentive:
>
> 1.  Any fixed station working me and only me in the CQWW
> for a unique multiplier will receive $XXX via PayPal.
>
> 2.  Any expedition station working me and only me in
> the CQWW will receive $XXX to cover their trip expenses.
>
> *****************************************************
>
> Granted these are extreme hypothetical examples, but once
> we start offering incentives to work specific stations,
> we are on a very slippery slope that has no boundaries.
> The concept of a level playing field, which is behind the
> spirit and intent of all contest rules, will very quickly
> vanish down that slippery slope.  BTW, this is the same
> reason WRTC goes to some lengths to prevent publicizing
> the identity of contestants' calls...i.e. to prevent
> "patriotic patronizing" by home country cheerleaders.
>
>          As I said before, I'm sure the Finns did not dream
> this up to try to win the IARU low power category,  but
> I wonder what comes next when others see what they did?
> Where does it end???
>
>                                          73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

- Jack Brindle, W6FB
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
---------------------


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>