Right. It's where the RF comes from that defines the station 'location', not
where the op is sitting!
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dale Putnam
Sent: 22 August 2005 01:28
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base
It seems to me that this is very neatly addressed in the FCC rules. Station
location is where the rf will be or is being radiated from, not from where
the studio or mic or control location might be located. That is usually
referred to as the control point, and sometimes is the mailing address.
On this point, the FCC has not wavered.
If the amateur contests desire to change reporting for some other reason,
I wonder how it would be if an operator were to set up remote stations, one
in each population center in the world, or country, then control them from
say... Idaho... or the North Pole, and claim that location as the multiplier
location??? Leaves one to question. And, the only thing stopping it would be
the expenditure, but we all know that isn't much of a slow down, or deterent
is it?
C U in the next Test....
--... ...--
Dale - WC7S qrp in WY
>From: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
>To: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base
>Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:26:08 -0700
>
>At 07:02 AM 8/21/2005, N7MAL wrote:
> >Saturday a friend of mine gave out some points in NAQP. He was in a
>state
> >different from the transmitter location. He was on an internet remote
> >base. What should he have used for his state? I read and re-read the
>rules
> >and didn't see it defined.
>
>The location of the transmitter. This will be addressed in 2006 revised
>rules.
>
>73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn@hornucopia.com)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
Scanned by IFB SafeMail http://www.ifb.net for spam/UCE and virus content.
IFB Spam-Score:**** (4.383)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Offshore Design Ltd
www.odl.co.uk
This email is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
and privileged information. You should not disclose its contents to any other
person. Any
unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are
not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|