CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base

To: "Cooper, Stewart" <coopers@odl.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base
From: MikeR <nf4l@nf4l.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:43:10 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Course the FCC regs don't have a lot of sway outside the U.S.......
Mike, NF4L

Cooper, Stewart wrote:

>Right. It's where the RF comes from that defines the station 'location', not 
>where the op is sitting!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dale Putnam
>Sent: 22 August 2005 01:28
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base
>
>
>
>It seems to me that this is very neatly addressed in the FCC rules. Station
>location is where the rf will be or is being radiated from, not from where
>the studio or mic or control location might be located. That is usually
>referred to as the control point, and sometimes is the mailing address.
>On this point, the FCC has not wavered.
>  If the amateur contests desire to change reporting for some other reason,
>I wonder how it would be if an operator were to set up remote stations, one
>in each population center in the world, or country, then control them from
>say... Idaho... or the North Pole, and claim that location as the multiplier
>location??? Leaves one to question. And, the only thing stopping it would be
>the expenditure, but we all know that isn't much of a slow down, or deterent
>is it?
>  C U in the next Test....
>--...   ...--
>Dale - WC7S qrp in WY
>
>  
>
>>From: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
>>To: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base
>>Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:26:08 -0700
>>
>>At 07:02 AM 8/21/2005, N7MAL wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Saturday a friend of mine gave out some points in NAQP.  He was in a
>>>      
>>>
>>state
>>    
>>
>>>different from the transmitter location. He was on an internet remote
>>>base. What should he have used for his state? I read and re-read the
>>>      
>>>
>>rules
>>    
>>
>>>and didn't see it defined.
>>>      
>>>
>>The location of the transmitter. This will be addressed in 2006 revised
>>rules.
>>
>>73 de Bruce, WA7BNM   (bhorn@hornucopia.com)
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>Scanned by IFB SafeMail http://www.ifb.net for spam/UCE and virus content.
>IFB Spam-Score:**** (4.383)
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>Offshore Design Ltd
>   
>www.odl.co.uk
>   
>This email is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain 
>confidential
>and privileged information. You should not disclose its contents to any other 
>person. Any
>unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are 
>not the
>intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>