CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on 40 SSB

To: "LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad" <la5he@otterstad.dk>,<Cqtestk4xs@aol.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on 40 SSB
From: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Reply-to: jmaass@columbus.rr.com
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 05:29:04 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of LA5HE Ragnar
> Otterstad
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:14 PM
> To: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on 40 SSB
> 
> 
> By the way, please listen for all the CW boys above 7040 in the WWCW.  I
> doubt there will as much griping about these violators as the CW guys do
> about the
> SSB guys.  Regardless of the bandwidth, I would imagine it still violates
> the
> spirit of the agreement and would cause you great grief too.
> 
> Bill K4XS
> 
> 
> The Region 1 bandplan I have allows CW above 7040.
> 
> 73  rag LA5HE
> 

The band plans for *all* Regions explicitly permits CW in the
entire 40 meter allocation. There is no issue of violating 
"...the spirit of the agreement..." even if CW fills the entire
band for CQWW CW.

73,  Jeff  K8ND


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>