[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?

To: <mwdink@eskimo.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:24:50 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
---- Original Message ----- 
From: <mwdink@eskimo.com>

> RG213 or LMR400?
> I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> Station Interference book would seem to indicate otherwise.
> RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had experience
> with stubs made of LMR400?
> 73
> dink

I would expect that the lower loss cable would be better, Dink. 
What does George's data show? I don't have his book. N6VI
made some stubs for W6UE's SO2R setup from LMR-400. 
They work very well, but I can't say that I have compared them 
to RG-213. 

Mike, W4EF.................................

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>