If you're talking HF, I think the LMR400 would be overkill. But if you're
talking about VHF-UHF, the LMR400 would be your best bet. It's far better
than RG213 above 400 MHz.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, k7qq wrote:
> Dink
> I've never heard of this LMR400 stuff, If a stub is being made for HF RG
> 213 is more than adiquate.
>
> After all it is a Stub to absorbe harmonics, even lossy old RG 11 should
> work, Just use ur handy dandy 259b to tune it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <mwdink@eskimo.com>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 20:48
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
>
>
> > RG213 or LMR400?
> >
> > I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> > Station Interference book would seem to indicate otherwise.
> >
> > RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had experience
> > with stubs made of LMR400?
> >
> > 73
> > dink
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|