CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QRPers --- Please QRQ

To: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>,"cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRPers --- Please QRQ
From: "Joe Brown" <joe.brown@gordmans.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:52:36 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Agree with Lee. If you miss the number, there is a good chance you also missed 
the PREC, and PREC is always the worst thing to ask for a fill on. Half the 
time the other station thinks you meant CK and sends that again, or sends ? or 
nothing at all. Alot of times I missed both and was hoping the op on the other 
end would send both instead of making me ask for PREC separately.

73 Joe W0DB


-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lee Hiers
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:09 AM
To: cq-contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRPers --- Please QRQ


On 7 Nov 2005 Doug  wrote:

> On a number of occasions I got the impression the request "NR?" meant
> "NR ES PREC?"...  that the op on the other end was surprised (and
> disappointed) that I replied with "156" instead of "156 Q".  Likewise
> for "CK?" seeming to mean "CK ES SECT?".  Maybe that was my
> imagination?  

Over the years I've figured out that is often the case, and almost 
always send the fill as NR & PREC...I've even programmed a message 
memory that way.

73 de Lee


-- 
Lee Hiers, AA4GA
Cornelia, Georgia

"Have Dobro Will Travel"



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>