CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?
From: "Pat Collins N8VW" <n8vw@linuxcolumbus.com>
Date: 11 Nov 2005 12:55:17 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:55:15 -0500, "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
wrote :

> Then, after SS CW, I saw some people mention the "dueling CQs" mode of a
logging program.  Well!  My slow little bulb began its feeble glow. 
Alternating CQs on two bands or two freq's.
> 

People used to get up in arms about how running multiple transmitters using
a lock-out system was against the rules, unsportsman like, we need a 10
minute rule, you name it.  And that was for multi-operators.  

Why is so2r somehow different?

Pat N8VW
http://scoreboard.oqp.us
http://www.oqp.us
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>