This may be true, but isn't part of the rationale to
significantly increase participation in a type of
contest (RTTY) that is otherwise a distant third to
the CW and phone tests?
73 Rich NN3W
--- Original Message ---
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Another view for 1-pointers
>
>K4XS writes:
>
>> Possible solution: dissolve the lower 48 US into 48
>> countries, about equal to EU. That would be fun, at
>> least for CQWW.
>
>Bill, the solution is to adopt the CQWW RTTY scoring
rules.
>In CQWW RTTY, "own country QSOs" are worth one
point. In
>addition US States and VE Provinces are multipliers.
Those
>changes would put US stations on (almost) even
footing with
>European stations and would put the Caribbean/northern
>South America on an (almost) even footing with IH9,
CAN,
>EA9, EA8, ZD8, etc.
>
>73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|