CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories
From: "K5ZM" <k5zm@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:35:44 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Do that, and NA loses it's unique appeal. (IMO, YMMV) It becomes 'just
another contest' with very little to differentiate it from all the other
domestic tests. 

'zm 


--
www.k5zm.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ku8e@bellsouth.net
> Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2006 7:22 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories
> 
>   With all the discussion going on about big gun vs little guns, guest
operators
> etc.. in NAQP has anyone ever thought of incorporating a tribander/wires
class
> into the
>  the contest rules. It seems like this works well for WPX .
> 
>   Personally, I would like to see NAQP have a high , low and QRP category.
It
> would then have something for everyones taste.
> 
> 
>   73, Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>