To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stnsinIARUcontest |
From: | "Mario, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:43:29 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
W9WI wrote: I could see disallowing credit for contacts between a HQ station and other stations in the same country *if* the other stations are "uniques", i.e. worked fewer than some threshold number (say, ten?) other stations besides the HQ operation. I'll bet it'd be a real nightmare for the log checkers though. N6TR did successful checking of 46 WRTC logs and 1000+ others within 24 hours! Portables excluded :-) Threshold might be just 3 different HQ stations and USA can work W1AW, NU1AW and VE3RAC easily. EU stations would have much wider choice. Quoting 5B4AGN on IARU - What have we here, a contest or a flag waving party? 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU, YU0SRJ, S50HQ, OI2HQ P.S. DA0HQ achieved over 50% DL QSO out of 19.000 in 2003! Free awards available :-) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stnsinIARUcontest ?, k3bu |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stnsin IARUcontest ?, Laurent Ferracci |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] NCJ Contest Tips Tricks & Techniques topic, Gary Sutcliffe |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQstnsin IARUcontest, Doug Smith W9WI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |