CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] A proposal

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] A proposal
From: "James Cain" <cainjim@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: James Cain <cainjim@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:12:30 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree with the reflector administrator that the SO1/2R discussion is a "dead 
horse." If one operator can listen to two different bands in different ears. 
good for her!

I have an idea, and if it's a dead horse I am not aware of it.

The recent IARU Radiosport contest was fun getting on the air for, for me at 
least, to see how many WRTC participants I could work. An added dimension to an 
otherwise "normal" contest.

Also this summer I got in the ARRL June VHF QSO Party and the CQ WW VHF 
Contest, on 6 Meters, with a dipole. It was fun because it was something new 
and different for me. 

There never have been any organized contests on the so-called "WARC bands," 
which have been available to us for more than 20 years. A long time ago I 
operated on these bands and worked DXCC on 30, 17, and 12 Meters. These are 
very interesting frequency allocations; it doesn't take a genius to know that 
when 20 Meters is good, and 15 Meters is fair, 17 Meters is Red Hot. 

I was not in the official loop when we got the WARC bands; it was 1978 or 1979, 
I think, with later implementation. But I would like to say that credit for the 
new bands belongs to the ARRL and it was, in my opinion, the ARRL's greatest 
achievement in my 44 years of membership. 

I do not know why these bands were stipulated to be "contest free." Maybe it 
depends on what your definition of "contest" is. As Ed Tilton, W1HDQ, a QST 
editor said 50 years ago, "Contesting is normal amateur radio speeded up."

There is no LAW against an "Activity Day" (contest) on a "WARC band." There's 
no LAW against a five-word-per-minute CW ragchewer on 7010 during a DX contest, 
either. Somebody just has to organize the Activity Day, announce it, and pump 
it up. We could do it on this very reflector. You would not need high power or 
a beam to be competitive in an activity like this. How cool would it be if we 
moved the upcoming NAQP CW to 30, 17, and 12 Meters? (Oh, OK, it would be 
cooler if we had some sunspots.)

I do not see the ARRL sponsoring anything like this, and there is no reason why 
they should.   

We all now have radios that cover these bands, and we aren't using them. In 
fact, most of us don't use any of the bands outside of a handful of weekends 
each year. In 1977 I was highly competitive in the ARRL CW DX Competition. I 
had a Collins S-Line. After the first weekend, I realized I'd better try to 
work a few multipliers on 160, for which I didn't have a radio (or an antenna, 
for that matter). I borrowed a TS-820, I think it was, for the second weekend 
of the Competition, and I think I worked three or four stations. Now, 160 has 
exploded in activity, and if you don't think contesters had a lot to do with 
that, well, I disagree. 

Jim Cain, K1TN

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>